Creating standards for fire prevention is what the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) is tasked with as an organization. While the NFPA is not an enforcement organization and does not carry out these standards on their own, Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJs) do reference the standards released by the NFPA in various regulations.
Various responsibilities for compliance with these NFPA standards fall on both facilities and equipment manufacturers, so we at AZO wanted to help break down some of the takeaways in the newest editions of NFPA 660, NFPA 652, and NFPA 61 and how they apply to our industry sector. Although NFPA 652 and NFPA 61 are still valid and active, they have been superseded by NFPA 660. For new installations, code officials are likely to continue referencing NFPA 652 and the relevant industry-specific standards until NFPA 660 is formally adopted by fire and building codes.
NFPA 660 is the newly consolidated standard that integrates several combustible dust standards, including NFPA 652 and NFPA 61. This standard aims to streamline requirements and eliminate inconsistencies across industry sectors.
NFPA 660 applies to all facilities handling combustible dust and provides a unified approach to dust hazard analysis (DHA), risk assessment, and explosion protection.
While NFPA 660 is now the primary combustible dust standard, NFPA 61 and NFPA 652 still provide valuable information for specific industries.
NFPA 652 and several other combustible dust standards have been incorporated into NFPA 660 to provide a single-source reference.
Requirements for Dust Hazard Analysis (DHA) have been standardized across industries.
Clearer definitions of combustible dust parameters to help industries determine compliance requirements.
Deadlines referenced in previous standards have been removed in NFPA 660, as those dates have already passed.
New specifications for explosion protection in small-volume air-material separators.
Enhanced requirements for ignition source management in spray dryer systems, mixers, and blenders.
Revised surface resistivity requirements for conveyor belts, lag belts, and lagging from 100 megohms to 300 megohms.
Clarifications in the management of change section to specify required versus recommended actions.
Expanded annex materials with updated DHA methodologies, including filtering efficiency of dust collectors and explosion venting alternatives for bins, silos, and tunnels.
A more detailed and comprehensive DHA checklist replacing previous versions.
Failure to complete a proper DHA can result in OSHA citations, such as:
Most OSHA citations related to combustible dust are tied to hazard communication deficiencies rather than equipment configuration.
Collect information on the material you handle or process.
List all equipment that handles the material and gather necessary safety specifications.
Identify areas where fire, explosion hazards, or degradation could occur at each stage of manufacturing.
Review each phase with a professional team and discuss potential fire/explosion scenarios.
Evaluate safeguards and mitigation measures.
Assess risk levels and document all findings to aid in hazard reduction.